Online Library
6-mm-long 4-mm-wide implants or longer implants in augmented bone- 3-year RCT results
EAO Online Library. Gasparro R. Oct 9, 2018; 232729
Roberta Gasparro
Roberta Gasparro
Login now to access Regular content available to all registered users.
Discussion Forum (0)
Rate & Comment (0)
One problem for rehabilitating patients with atrophic jaws is insufficient bone height for placing implants of “adequate” length to support fixed dental prostheses. In these conditions, short dental implants with an intra-bony length of 8 mm or less are used as an alternative to bone augmentation for placing longer implantsTo evaluate whether 6 mm long × 4 mm wide dental implants could be an alternative**to implants of at least 10 mm long placed in bone augmented with bone substitutes in posterior atrophic jaws.**A total of 20 patients with bilateral atrophic mandibles, and 20 patients with bilateral atrophic maxillae, having 5 to 7 mm of bone height below the maxillary sinus or 6 mm to 8 mm above the mandibular canal, had their side of the jaws randomly allocated according to a split-mouth design. They were allocated to receive one to three 6 mm long × 4 mm wide implants, or implants of at least 10 mm long in augmented bone. Mandibles were vertically augmented with interpositional equine bone blocks and resorbable barriers, and implants were placed 3 months later. Maxillary sinuses were augmented with particulated porcine bone via a lateral window and implants were placed simultaneously. After 4 months, all implants were submerged and loaded with provisional prostheses. Four months later, definitive prostheses were delivered. Outcome measures were prosthesis and implant failures, any complication and radiographic peri-implant marginal bone level changes.****Two short maxillary implants affected by peri-implantitis failed together with their prosthesis vs three mandibular prostheses that could not be placed on implants at least 10 mm long due to graft failures. There were no statistically significant differences in implant (P = 1.000) and prosthesis failures (P = 0.625). In total, 18 complications occurred in 13 patients at augmented sites vs four complications in three patients with 6 mm-long implants. Significantly more complications occurred at grafted sites in mandibles (P = 0.031), but not in maxillae (P = 0.219). In mandibles, patients with 6 mm-long implants lost an average of 1.25 mm of periimplant bone at 3 years vs 1.54 mm in patients with longer implants. The difference was statistically significant (P = 0.010). In maxillas, patients with 6 mm-long implants lost an average of 1.28 mm of peri-implant bone at 3 years vs 1.50 mm in patients with longer implants. The difference was statistically significant (P = 0.003).****Results at 3 years after loading indicate that 6 mm-long implants with a conventional diameter of 4 mm achieved similar, if not better, results than longer implants placed in augmented bone. Short implants might be a preferable choice to bone augmentation, especially in posterior mandibles, since the treatment is faster, cheaper and associated with less morbidity. However, data obtained 5 to 10 years after loading are necessary before making reliable recommendations**
Code of conduct/disclaimer available in General Terms & Conditions
Anonymous User Privacy Preferences

Strictly Necessary Cookies (Always Active)

MULTILEARNING platforms and tools hereinafter referred as “MLG SOFTWARE” are provided to you as pure educational platforms/services requiring cookies to operate. In the case of the MLG SOFTWARE, cookies are essential for the Platform to function properly for the provision of education. If these cookies are disabled, a large subset of the functionality provided by the Platform will either be unavailable or cease to work as expected. The MLG SOFTWARE do not capture non-essential activities such as menu items and listings you click on or pages viewed.

Performance Cookies

Performance cookies are used to analyse how visitors use a website in order to provide a better user experience.

Google Analytics is used for user behavior tracking/reporting. Google Analytics works in parallel and independently from MLG’s features. Google Analytics relies on cookies and these cookies can be used by Google to track users across different platforms/services.

Save Settings