Save
Online Library
Does the time of abutment change influence the treatment success of immediate implants in the anterior maxilla? A randomised clinical controlled trial.
EAO Online Library. Pohl V.
Oct 9, 2018; 232507
Veronika Pohl
Veronika Pohl
Login now to access Regular content available to all registered users.
Abstract
Discussion Forum (0)
Rate & Comment (0)
The copy abutment technique was described by Fuerhauser et al. in 2006. It is a concept to load immediate implants in view steps with abutment and crown. The emergence profile must be designed according to the anatomical form to provide support fo the soft tissue with the result of an esthetic outcome close to the natural tooth. Studies show that the frequent disconnection of the abutment from the implant leads to a significantly periimplantary bone loss. ****The aim of this study was to evaluate if early abutment change results in less marginal bone loss, improved soft tissue preservation and therefore more patient satisfaction. **26 patients were treated with a single immediate implanting the esthetic zone (13-23). The implant position was planned preoperatively. Flawless surgery was performed and all implants were immediately non-functionally loaded with a provisional abutment and crown. **After surgery the patient collective was randomly separated into two groups. The first group received the definitive zirconoxid abutment 4 days and the other group 3 months after implant placement. In both groups definitive crowns were installed approximately 3 months after operation. The soft tissue aesthetics were assessed by the Pink Esthetic Score (Furhauser, Florescu et al. 2005). The bone level was measured by use of DVT and intramural x-rays. Patient satisfaction was assessed by the Oral Health Impact Profile score (OHIP). **This study concludes the 6 months follow up. **In comparison of the two groups there was no significant difference concerning the PES, bone level and OHIP. The average PES in the early group was 11.62 (±1.3), in the late group 10.3 (±3.02).**The bone level in the first group was -0.38mm (±0.89), in the second -0.12 (±1.01). The OHIP was specified in the early group with 0.36 (±1.21), in the late group 0 (±0).In this study the timing of the abutment change does not seem to make a difference. Nevertheless further Lon time studies with larger study populations are needed to confirm these findings. _x000C_
Code of conduct/disclaimer available in General Terms & Conditions
Anonymous User Privacy Preferences

Strictly Necessary Cookies (Always Active)

MULTILEARNING platforms and tools hereinafter referred as “MLG SOFTWARE” are provided to you as pure educational platforms/services requiring cookies to operate. In the case of the MLG SOFTWARE, cookies are essential for the Platform to function properly for the provision of education. If these cookies are disabled, a large subset of the functionality provided by the Platform will either be unavailable or cease to work as expected. The MLG SOFTWARE do not capture non-essential activities such as menu items and listings you click on or pages viewed.


Performance Cookies

Performance cookies are used to analyse how visitors use a website in order to provide a better user experience.



Google Analytics is used for user behavior tracking/reporting. Google Analytics works in parallel and independently from MLG’s features. Google Analytics relies on cookies and these cookies can be used by Google to track users across different platforms/services.


Save Settings